Father Noah's Providence　From Sawada Chihei's blog:

■Chairman Song and his wife each talk about the same incident with Father. It happened on July 19, 2009, at a hotel in Monaco overlooking the Mediterranean Sea. Early in the morning, Father had his photograph taken on the hotel balcony with a large passenger ship anchored in the port in the background. During the Hoon Dok Session that followed, Father apparently took off his pants, but it is unclear whether he also took off his diaper, but this was an incident for the indemnity restoration of Ham's unbelief in Noah's family. The passenger ship in the port symbolizes the ark, and June 1, more than 40 days before this day, was the start of the flood judgment.
Both of their stories are about the same scene, so they are basically the same. Even when the unbelievable event of Father removing his trousers and becoming naked in public occurred, Mother watched over it calmly, and as we can see from this, Mother understood Father, gave absolute faith to Father, and was one with Father, and the purpose of praising Mother is the same.

■This event is very interesting. The fact that the large passenger ship was the ark, the name of the shipping company MSC means Lord of the Second Advent, and that 40 days after the start of the flood judgment, eight people were in a hotel room and Father got naked there is a very important and complete proof. However, I felt something was off when they both added that Mother was peaceful and quiet at that time, which was proof that Mother was one with Father and that Mother was a person of absolute faith.
Was Mother really peaceful and quiet at that time, as they both said in unison? Was she "understanding the incomprehensible and believing the unbelievable" and "accurately knowing the providence of heaven"? She may have been quiet on the outside. However, it cannot be said that she understood, believed, and knew Father on the inside. This is because Father exposed Mother's lack of faith when he said, "Last night, in the bedroom, Mom asked me, 'Why did you do that in front of our children?' I replied, 'There is nothing to be ashamed of between parents and children. There is no boundary between parents and children.'" Is the following statement by Mrs. Lee true?
□Mrs. Lee: Through the events of this day, I was most surprised and deeply moved by True Mother's absolute faith in Heavenly Parent, True Father, and the providence. If Mother had questioned Father's actions, such as, "Why did you do that?" or "What does that mean in front of our children?", or if she had expressed this in her actions, what would have happened to Father's reputation? And would he have been able to accomplish his desired providence? (2017.1.17 "World Family" 2017.3/P.41)

■According to Hyung Jin Nim, this is what Mother did in the True Family.
□Moon Hyung Jin Nim: Whenever there is such anguish in the soul, what kind of habit did Han Mother create? The habit of thinking, "Father is tormenting me." The habit of thinking from the "self" point of view. A culture of thinking, "I am having a very hard time," even though one is in the position of the wife of Christ and the head of the bride. So the True Family also learned such a false culture. A false culture of "Oh, I am having a very hard time, I am suffering." And the second generation and the leaders also learned a false culture. To put it simply, it is a culture of secretly stabbing and criticizing Father, a culture of hating Christ. (2015.7.22)

■Mother was spoken ill of by Father, and created a culture of secretly stabbing the Messiah in the True Family. I think it is fair to say that Mrs. Lee's words above are an attempt to elevate Mother to our highest position by emphasizing Mother's outward behavior of remaining quiet, knowing her inner lack of faith in Father. Hyung Jin Nim testified about an incident in Nigeria exactly two years after the Monaco incident.
□Moon Hyung Jin Nim: It was about five minutes before the 5 o'clock Hoon Dok Hae was to begin. Father was moving things around in the room. There was a state of panic in the room. Mother and Jeong Won Ju (aide) were there too, and they said, "Father has gone mad!" Father said, "He's gone crazy." (September 20, 2015) (Visit to Nigeria July 14-18, 2011)

■At that time, Mother said that Father had "gone mad." As Mrs. Lee said, if Mother had absolute faith in Father, she would not have said such a thing.
I believe Father had also stopped wearing diapers. Otherwise, there would have been no indemnity for the failure of the Noah family. I doubt whether Mother was watching Father peacefully and quietly at that time, as Mr. and Mrs. Song say. Father said, "Last night, in the bedroom, Mother asked me, 'Why did you do that in front of our children?'" It is entirely possible that Father was hysterical when he said, "Why did you do that in front of our children?"
Didn't the providential simultaneity of the Monaco Ark only accelerate Mother's treatment of Father as "being crazy"? I think it is all the more problematic that Chairman Song and his wife, who know the true nature of Mother, have used this incident to praise and celebrate Mother, given that this is an event of historical significance.